At some point late last year, I was walking through Preston City
Centre when I saw a girl who seemed to be wearing a pair of tights as if they
were trousers.
“Huh?”
I thought.
“That doesn’t seem right.”
But they must be tights, I assumed, because I could see her
knickers through them. I’m not just talking about the outline either, I could totally
make out the pattern, and even, although vaguely, the colour.
And then I started to see other girls wearing the same thing! I
try not to oogle women, but I kept ending up walking behind these girls and
becoming mesmerised by their darkly sheathed, yet fully displayed, bottoms, as
if I was driving through a ‘bum ‘n’ muff’ exhibit in a tinted-windowed
Volkswagen. I mentioned to my ex:
“I keep seeing girls wearing tights like trousers,”
And she told me:
“No, they’re not tights, they’re just cheap leggings from
Primark.”
Imagine that! I realise that leggings are in fashion right now,
but surely people who want to be in vogue can spare an extra couple of quid if
it means not turning their nether regions into a shady viewing portal!?
“You think what you saw is bad,” my ex continued. “I saw a girl
in Lidl wearing a pair, and she didn’t even have any knickers on.”
Grizzly innit!
I was confused by all this. I mean, do these girls not know how
transparent their cheaply priced leggings actually are? If there are girls going
out fully commando, you would imagine not, yet in Preston you couldn’t go out
without seeing more fannies (UK meaning) and fannies (US meaning) than you
could handle, so you’d think that one of them would twig on maybe? Unless they
all just thought:
“God, look at all these tramps. Not like me. With my hot
leggings.”
I felt like going up to one and saying:
“I can not only tell that you have a picture of Winnie the Pooh on
your bottom, but also that he is scratching around inside a honey jar,
and saying, ‘This pot is the stickiest,’ which I assume is some sort of crude anal
sex reference.”
Although obviously I couldn’t do that, because that would have
been mortifying for the poor girl. Perhaps I should have put posters up,
saying:
“HAVE YOU SEEN THIS CROTCH? NO? ARE YOU SURE? TRY LOOKING DOWN
BEFORE YOU ANSWER AGAIN.”
There’s also the possibility that they just don’t mind having
their undies visible for all to see? I mean, they’ve paid for them, they might
as well let everyone see what they’ve got for their money. A lot of my friends
are into that hip style of dressing that involves letting your bum hang out
from the top of your trousers, as if even belts are too oppressive for them. Maybe this is just an extension of that sort of business?
Whatever it is, I hope it’s over now anyway. If you wear cheap,
black leggings, you should go in the bathroom and have a good old look to see
what’s actually on display. Maybe it’s more obvious in daylight, so go outside
and ask a stranger:
“What’s Tigger asking Eeyore?”
If you are wearing the cheap ones, go out and treat yourself to
an opaque pair! I mean, if fur coats were in fashion, you wouldn’t buy a rat fur
cardigan would you, as if it were the same thing?
UPDATE: Since I started writing this entry, I have seen some
girls in Salford doing the same thing. They were boarding a train to Manchester
when I saw them too, so they may be in the city RIGHT NOW!
And oh yes, while we are on the subject of leggings, let’s talk
about leggings! And, more specifically, the 80’s revival.
Do you realise that the 80’s revival has
actually been going on for twelve years now, which is longer than the actual
1980’s managed in the first place? Which makes you ask yourself several
hard-hitting questions:
- Fuck?
- How long will it go on for? and
- What happens if it never ends?
Having now lasted longer than the original, does this mean that
the true 80’s is actually ‘now,’ in the same way that Lenny Kravatz is the true
Jimi Hendrix?
Only time will tell. Or possibly some sort of psychic. Although we will then have to wait for time to verify what the psychic said. And then kill the psychic if they got it right, before they get chance to predict 'SECRET PROJECT X.'
Err... which doesn't exist obviously...



No comments:
Post a Comment